Riderchick

February 28, 2009

Anti-MSF?

I’ve heard that I’m “anti-MSF” a lot lately. First it makes me laugh and then it made me think about the lies we’re willing to tell to keep on believing the lies we love to believe. But it’s the “anti-MSF” thing that’s the subject of today’s entry. Those who write say it’s like it’s a bad thing.

My research has found that the majority of riders agree on two things and two things only when it comes to riders being safe on the road: training is good and the role of experience. And they believe that training is necessary for novices even when they themselves haven’t taken training. They disagree—and sometimes vehemently on everything else.

I believe strongly—even passionately—in rider training: that it can be effective, that it can equip a rider to prevent crashes. I believe, furthermore, that good, effective training—and seeing the results on our roads—is essential to preserving our rights as riders. I am passionate about riding. I have the heart and soul of a rider and it is the metaphor of my life. And I entered motorcycling through a beginner rider training course. And I have not swerved from that devotion to safe, effective motorcycle training.

For more than four years, I’ve researched and investigated rider education and MSF.

  • I’ve uncovered that at least seven have died from crashes in training and at least three others have suffered near-fatal injuries including a case of total paralysis and that efforts had been undertaken to, at the very least, minimize what occurred.
  • I demonstrated how MSF is not only aware of how deadly the course has become but changed forms and procedures to not just reflect that but to implicate the instructor.
  • I’ve uncovered MSF’s true nature and purpose as a trade group solely focused on using rider training to sell as many motorcycles as possible.
  • I documented how MSF stole its curriculum from existing ones and then eradicated all other competitive curricular products.
  • I outlined how they used SMROs and riders to achieve a virtual monopoly in this field.
  • I documented how it took control over training, set standards—and then changed them at will—to suit the manufacturer members’ interests even when it made training less safe.
  • I discovered numerous instances of Harley and MSF undermining state programs, bankrupting one, trying to turn motorcycle rights activists against the state program, fiddling with legislation.
  • I exposed that MSF sued Oregon not over the supposed copyright issue so much as a threat to force Oregon to allow Rider’s Edge programs to have the driver’s license-waiver.
  • I showed how the curriculum has been dumbed down over the years—particularly in terms of hazard awareness, risk perception skills and street strategies.
  • I discovered that the number of crashes in courses has zoomed up far over the previous curriculum and so have injuries (not to mention the deaths).
  • I revealed how MSF uses the training course to prevent consumers from winning product liability suits.
  • I showed how MSF has a plan in place to take over state programs for its own aggrandizement and control and is implementing it.
  • I showed how MSF minimizes the importance of the classroom, how it’s pursing the online class with no regard to how that will affect riders or safety or training.
  • I’ve used MSF documents to show that MSF has misrepresented, misled or out and out lied time and time again.
  • I showed how they dumbed down the licensing tests and how the driver’s license-waiver does not equal the same level of skill riders would have to demonstrate at the DMV and showed why and when MSF began to pursue that policy.
  • I demonstrated how MSF swift-boated detractors and sold the BRC through manipulation and deceit.
  • I revealed that MSF knew the results of the studies that found it was ineffective and changed the language to reflect that in every instance where they could be legally held accountable.
  • I demonstrated how MSF has deceived through “research” to promote the manufacturers’ interests.
  • I revealed how MSF/MIC has used the media to blame riders for crashes and has used Motorcycle Awareness Month to castigate riders.
  • I revealed that MSF’s Tim Buche said years ago that the accident causation study would take place “over his dead body” and—lo and behold, the manufacturers now have a major financial stake in it and control over it (as they did MAIDS through ACEM) and it has also been “dumbed down” from the original plan—and has barely begun after all these years.

And that’s just what came to me off the top of my head as I’m writing this. There’s more—a whole lot more. I came to find all that out—and then presented it to readers by evidence directly from MSF’s documents, reputable studies, state ethics commissions, legal documents, eyewitnesses, motorcycle safety experts, countless interviews. I brought in evidence from marketing, business, economics and psychology and kinesiology and crash tests—and that too is just from the top of my head. I’ve compared it to what training is in countries like Canada and the UK and licensing in the UK and the EU directive. In short, I based what I wrote on facts. On evidence. On comparison to other industries, activities and organizations, countries. Iow, the kind of evidence that convinces sane, rational people who don’t have vested interests in maintaining the status quo.

Over the years I came to the same conclusion any other sane, rational person who didn’t have a vested interest in rider training, MSF or Harley-Davidson would hold: it’s not what it presents itself to be—an organization pursuing the common good.

Given my passionate belief in what rider training could be and should be and knowledge of what can happen on the roads when it is, well, duh, of course I’m “anti-MSF”. Given what I know about MSF, I’d be insane and irrational if I wasn’t “anti-MSF”? You’d be crazy if you’d expect me to be “pro-MSF”.

To say I’m “anti-MSF” is like saying I’m “anti-Madoff”. I’ll take the label and happily put it on a t-shirt, thank you very much.

The question isn’t why am I so “anti-MSF”. The question is: Why aren’t you?

February 24, 2009

Something old both out-dated and up-to-date

Something I’ve been working on reminded me of a video I posted on youtube.com back in August of 2007. Dangerous Profits: Rider Education Goes To The Movies. I hadn’t watched it for—well, probably since shortly after I posted it and some folks on a motorcycle site took umbrage at it.

So I watched it. It’s a little out-of-date:

The lawsuit is settled to TEAM Oregon’s advantage.

Back then, MSF had taken over 4 states. Now it’s taken over another one—with two or more on their way down.

Back then there had only been 5 deaths in rider ed—now there’s seven that MSF will confirm—plus, of course, that neck down paralysis crash.

But it was surprising how relevant it still is…watch it and see for yourself.

February 20, 2009

Appropos of nothing but too funny not to share

Filed under: Uncategorized — wmoon @ 2:23 am

This is a legitimate posting that came in a few minutes ago.  I have no reason to believe the poster is nothing but  sincere. I can’t be sure because his username on this particular site is IMtiredofthebs@xxx.xxx which could go either way. At any rate–his deliberate or accidental mistakes makes this want ad have a delightfully bizzare meaning:

“Im running for political office in a small town and im in need of some sigh
stakes to hold my sins if any one has some around and not being used i would
be very much appreciated i will have a prop pick up thank you XXXX

If only sigh stakes could hold our sins!

February 13, 2009

Winter Dreams

Filed under: personal — wmoon @ 9:03 pm

Winter dreams of twisty roads and straight highways. Of places visited and now recalled.

To remember the river of the road when we sailed along it like leaves, carried along by sweet velocity. To lose ourselves in the rhythm of the ride and find ourselves in the freedom of the wind.

Good friends and mom and pop diners. Long talks in the soft and tender dark when heat lighting flashes on the horizon.

Good times caught in still photos but still alive in our hearts.

The laughing joy of a shared ride and beers at the end of the day when riding is done.

Sweet memories in winter.

We cannot forget that we are most alive when we ride our own ride. In the cold of winter it burns within us.

We will ride away and ride toward.

The winter will end and spring will come.


Happy Valentine’s Day to all who know and live the love of the ride.

February 11, 2009

Reality check

Filed under: Motorcycle safety,motorcycle training,personal — wmoon @ 11:29 pm

Recent experiences have taught me a lot–way too late–about not just rider education but human nature and who I am. And it’s given me a lot of clarity about what’s been happening in my life lately.

Just over a week ago I was offered a job at a perfume company as an office manager. From the first interview, there were little things that seemed a bit off but I ignored them. After the second interview, there were red flags–but I ignored them as well. The biggest red flag was that questions were ridiculed–a bad sign for someone like me. But hey, I’ve been told by someone I trusted there’s no harm in living a charade. So I took the job. In fact, that’s one of the things they told us the first day, “act as if it’s true.”

Training began with learning about sales and marketing. To do that we were to sell at least 15 bottles of perfume. That wasn’t the problem–the problem was that it had to be done in less than 24 hours. Though we hadn’t even seen–let alone smelled these perfumes nor seen anything–even the order forms–that had the company’s name on it.  Not to mention the order form used not the knock-off names–there were no names on the bottles–but the trademarked names of the very expensive designer perfumes like Issey Miyake, White Diamonds and Emotions–the one that uses pheromones and is called “sex in a bottle”. We were given no information about the products, not even allowed to smell them or see them all. Nor any information on how to counter people’s objections that they were knock-offs. It felt so wrong-, but what did that matter?

But I swallowed my bile, determined to not ask the uncomfortable questions, not find out what was wrong and concentrate on what was right and stay employed. Be a passenger and do what they want, be what they want, and I would succeed. And I really needed a job so I was going to do it.

I came home that day to a comment on the Moonrider Redux site. She had read the entry about one of the bills and claimed her organization was behind the legislation. I have no reason to disbelieve her and am convinced she was utterly sincere and truly believed what she said. She also said she taught 184 students in 2008. In many ways I think what she said represents the vast majority of those in the rider ed community.

This woman did not like my entry on the bill at all. She took offense that I had gone through the bill and analyzed it. She accused me of a lot of things but she isn’t the first and won’t be the last nor was she the worst.

No, it was the substance of her e-mail that depressed the hell out of me–why she was fighting for the legislation: From what she said in her missive, it didn’t appear that she had either read the bill or she had read it and didn’t understand what it said or what it would allow or what it really would and wouldn’t do. For example, there had to be a state program, she said,because people who weren’t certified were teaching others to ride and “are charging money for something that their students cannot receive benefit from.” No state program can stop that. And that’s just the least of the many naive things she wrote. Well-meaning, then, but ignorant.

She knew nothing abut training or rider ed or state programs but what the MSF spin-machine has pumped out. Yet she took me to task because I had done the research and brought up points that challenged that spin machine and made that available for people like her to be able to make informed decisions. As if merely presenting that there are other factors and interests and a long background at work is inherently destructive and wrong. As if, of course, the MSF spin story is the true one–and what I say must be wrong.

It seemed as if just the act of questioning–just like at the fragrance company–was seen to be inherently wrong. In fact, she wrote, “You would be so much more useful if you got up from the computer and worked towards safety” and that she, unlike me, did “real work!!! Work that saves lives and not cost lives!! Whatever problems you have with the MSF—don’t jeopardize those new riders and young riders that need some type of training!!! Stop being petty!!”

Iow, be a passenger–this time on the MSF bus–and succeed: Do “real work” for motorcycle safety. Pointing out that MSF has no non-industry oversight or accountability is irrelevant. Pointing out tat the training, in fact, puts new and young riders in jeporady isn’t “real work” Pointing out that the course is, in fact deady, is petty. Shut up, Wendy. Be a passenger on the MSF bus.

It’s not like others haven’t leveled the same charge at me. In fact, a couple years ago someone claiming they spoke for both TEAM Oregon and the Oregon Department of Justice took me to task during a phone call. I was harming Oregon’s case. I should shut up, not not publicize what the case was about or the evidence in Oregon’s favor. I should just let the court handle matters. No one needed to know what was going on or the history or anything. Just shut up because I was doing more harm than good. Get on the back, Wendy, and shut up.

He was someone I had no reason not to trust and many reasons to trust–and so I believed him and was devastated. It turned out he wasn’t speaking for TEAM Oregon nor the ODOJ at all–and it turned out he had close ties to MSF’s Oregon attorneyand lobbyist–the one who’s very words I had been publishing on the blog. Pure coincidence, I’m sure. So maybe that should be “$hut up, Wendy.”

I’ve heard that “Give in and get on the back, Wendy” a lot over the years: Recant and then you’ll get a paying job in the field you love so much. Like the time when someone I thought was a trusted friend basically offered me a corporate job, lots of money and benefits, lots of influence–just think of all the good I could do–and it could be mine if I only gave up the blog. He went on to rattle off several other reasons why continuing the blog was not in rider eds best interest: I wasn’t the one, I hadn’t been effective, I was preventing something from being done, if I left then another would arise if one was, indeed, meant to arise or anything to happen. All I had to do was stop writing the blog. Get on the back, Wendy. Shut up and get on the back.

And I thought about how some people blamed me that the old journalspace blog wasn’t more effective because of my tone–so I had changed the tone on the Moonrider Redux blog. But here’s this woman–and that Dave Halen–still thinking I’m bashing MSF. And then there was my friend who, when I was at a very low point, told me it was because the entries were too long–and I’ve done all I can to keep them short–to no avail either.

As I read that poor lady’s post right after I had come home from the funky-smelling fragrance job all that and more came to mind. I thought–they’re right. I’ve heard that in my personal life as well: it harms no one to live a charade. Just go along to get along. It doesn’t matter what you think is good for you–do what’s good for me or for my friend. Iow, be a passenger on my ride. And shut up back there.

But still, I went through the motions–I asked her to verify who she was and when I gave her the opportunity to answer questions about how that bill got before the legislature or other questions she refused to answer and told me–didn’t ask me–not to post her comment. And I didn’t and still haven’t even though once it’s submitted the author doesn’t have any control over what happens to it or how it’s used.

It’s a lesson I learned over a year ago. Because of cyberstalkers, I began censoring what I wrote and how I wrote it to protect others who, as it turned out, weren’t worthy of protection. I was, in a real way, a passenger in my own writing.

And that’s when it all came together–my life, my work for true motorcycle safety and my efforts to find a job. I had been down this passenger road before and it hadn’t worked for me. I had lived a lie, I had bent over and took whatever I was given.

I hadn’t thought I had become so much of a passenger again. I had to remember who I am and so I dug through my files and found that essay I had written years ago and posted it. It’s my line in the sand: I can’t go down that road again. I am a motorcycle.

And then I quit that smelly job that stank to high heavens. And after I did, I found out it was a bad, bad thing–sortof a cross between cult members selling flowers and a downscale multi-level marketing system. I was right–it was wrong.

Yes, I ask questions. That’s what I do. That’s what I’m good at. Those questions make some defensive–but it’s not asking questions that’s wrong. Yes, I challenge what people believe because they’ve accepted the easy, familiar answers. That’s their problem. Yes, I find illumination for greater issues in my life. That some take it personally is their problem.

But I won’t shut up. And I won’t live a charade. I am a motorcycle. I won’t give in. I am who I am. It’s my life and I ride in front. If you value that, then I’m happy to ride with you. If you don’t, bugger off–no one invited you after all.

February 5, 2009

I am a motorcycle

Filed under: culture,personal essay — wmoon @ 6:23 pm

This personal essay is the nucleus of a book I am working on about women riders. It has nothing to do with rider ed and everything to do with who I am, where I came from and why I ride a motorcycle. What needs to be changed has been changed in order to protect who it needs to protect. It is frank. It is also long. You are warned.

In June, 2002, life and death were poised in a Cirque de Soleil balance as I roared along California’s 210 on tIM’s Harley-Davidson Sportster 883R. The Sportster 883R looks like the old flat track racers—it’s painted Harley orange and black and has almost straight, wide handlebars. When we had traded motorcycles a few minutes before, the sun had just set and the sky was still flushed with 60’s colors —hot pink, chrome yellow, and tangerine—while the mountains were a dusky navy blue. Like a steel cable the concrete freeway uncoiled over the slopes of the San Fernando Valley.

All I knew in the velocity and rush of endorphins was that I needed to take responsibility and control of my life, find my own balance and take care of my own needs. Which is why I was roaring down the highway away from tIM.

I zoomed up to and around cars as if they were stationary slalom poles and I was a down hill skier. I had shaped what I did and what I wanted around what others wanted and wanted of me for my entire life. I did what made them happy no matter how unhappy it had made me. And I couldn’t allow myself to do that any longer. Eventually, tIM caught up but it was too late—I had already left him behind. I had finally moved from the passenger seat in my life to the driver’s seat. And it was all the motorcycle’s fault.

tIM is not a typo. It’s an affectation he adopted when the Internet was just a bunch of geeks conserving the 9600 baud rate with abbreviations written in golden letters on black screens. Since those days are long over, I could write it properly, but the mixed case reveals a great deal about him.

That afternoon, we had ridden up Big Tujunga Canyon to the Crest and followed it down to the 210. The Crest is officially known as the Angeles Crest Highway and it’s one of the most lethal roads in Southern California. But I don’t think of death when I ride the Crest, I think of life—abounding, passionate life—lived at high speed. And I think of my first date with tIM, five years earlier though I hadn’t thought it was a date at the time. I had thought he was merely a friend cheering me up.

I needed cheer because, the day before, I had walked away from my job as an executive assistant/office manager of a small production company. I had refused to change the date back on the franking machine so it would look as if my boss had mailed his taxes on time. “My brother-in-law is a postal supervisor, and he says they watch for that after April 15th,” I explained. “It’s illegal and they not only fine you, the company can’t use a postage machine anymore and you still have to pay the late penalty.” I had his best interests at heart, but he had not taken it well. While he loved my Midwestern work ethic, he despised my Midwestern morality. When he got back from Cannes, France, he gave me the ultimatum—quit or be fired. I had not taken that well and had left work leaving it undecided. What upset me the most about the whole thing was that it had taken me so little time to fail so badly.

Four months before, I had moved out to Los Angeles with only enough for the first month’s rent and security deposit on an apartment and four hundred dollars cash for gas, groceries and utilities. It was a huge risk but one I had to take. For 21 years, I had followed my husband Mark’s dreams no matter where they led. There would be time one day, he said, to pursue mine and I had believed him until I finally realized he never meant for that day to come. That’s when I discovered my dreams were as much about leaving him as about writing success. I asked him for a divorce and he insisted on custody of the boys. The boys insisted on custody of the dog. So my teenage daughters and I had left Hudson, Wisconsin at 5 a.m. in mid-January towing a Lumina sedan behind a U-Haul truck. Three hours from home we were blindsided by weather.

At the first gas stop, my 17 year-old daughter Jenny had begged to drive the truck, and I let her. Twenty minutes later we drove under an overpass. On one side of the bridge, it had been calm with a gentle mist. On the other side, there were sixty mph wind gusts and ice on the road. The truck blew across one lane and Jenny over-corrected and it fishtailed. Bang! The Lumina hit the truck then played Crack the Whip. Around and around we went then snap! We were in the ditch. I changed places with Jenny so the cops would think I had put us there. As the three of us shivered in the cab, I said. “Maybe this is a sign.” I stared across snow-covered corn fields. “Maybe we should just turn around and go home.” No, the girls insisted. I couldn’t give up. I had to give my dream a chance.

Snow began to fall as the tow truck pulled us out and within ten miles it had turned into a freak blizzard. We couldn’t see the tail lights of the car ahead unless we rode their bumper. I couldn’t help thinking we should’ve gone back. Perhaps it wasn’t too late. I could make up with Mark and stop the divorce. The family would be together, and wasn’t that the most important thing? After all, moving to Los Angeles to pursue a career writing in the movie industry was too big a gamble for someone as old as I was. But in a blizzard turning back is no longer an option: you either become stranded on the side of the road or you drive on. I drove on. A few miles past the Iowa state line, we drove out of the storm and on through winter-bare and brown fields.

Two days later we drove through Needles, California and on through the Mojave desert in a high wind advisory and arrived in Los Angeles in the middle of a rainstorm. I had already flown out to LA two weeks earlier to find an apartment and sign up for temp agencies. Hoping to delight my daughters with exoticism, I had chosen the most California-style two-bedroom apartment I could afford—an older garden court building with pink stucco walls, a pool in the middle overshadowed by tall palms, an avocado tree and night-blooming jasmine. But it, like most Los Angeles apartments, was on a street packed with other apartment buildings and that was too great a psychological distance from our spacious five-bedroom home set on an acre of land a few hundred yards from the St. Croix river. The girls hated it. Of course, now they look back and love it.

We got soaking wet and bone-chilled as we carried up the sofa and chairs and beds and desks and what seemed to be a thousand boxes. It was the last rain Los Angeles had for almost a year; the next day was sunny and warm as we settled in and that night the Packers won the Super Bowl. On Monday, the temp agency called and sent me down to the production company to be the Chief Financial Officer’s assistant and office manager.

For some reason, my boss, Bob, took me out to lunch that first day. How odd, the other two assistants said. He doesn’t do that. But he certainly liked to eat with me; as the first weeks passed I was sent out several times a week to pick up lunch for the two of us or he took me out to trendy restaurants. To talk about business, he said, though little business was ever discussed. He was impressed, he said, that I had started to work two days after arriving in LA. I was smart and capable. He liked that. Within two weeks, I was negotiating a permanent position and salary, and within a month, I was hired permanently.

I knew I was lucky. Wonderfully lucky to have landed a job so quickly in the industry. Absurdly lucky that my boss was willing to pay me a good salary—far more than the previous assistants had gotten. And he was wonderful. So attentive. Loved to have me sit beside him in his office, his leg so naturally, gradually sliding over until his knee was touching mine. I would shift away to find his knee touching my leg again a few moments later. Then, at every opportunity, there was the hand on the elbow or small of my back or some reason he had to bend over me at my desk or get me to bend over his. I was sure this couldn’t be what I thought it was. Maybe, I thought, this kind of touchy boss-employee relationship was the way things were done in the Southland—and things did go south after I told him I was flattered but uncomfortable and that and led up to the tax return mishap a few days later. So there I was, with a bit more in the bank but without a job.

As I walked out of the production company that Friday night, I didn’t think I would be so lucky again—and, even if I was, my daughters hated LA more than ever. I should’ve listened to the signs and never left the Midwest. So, when tIM called to ask me if I wanted to get out of the house, I was eager to get away from the confusion and worry and the girls. But I wasn’t interested in anyone. Especially tIM.

I had met him through mutual screenwriter friends shortly after I had moved to Los Angeles. He was a trucker by night, a writer and inventor by day, and had sold jokes to Jay Leno. tIM rarely wore anything but a stained t-shirt and jeans, was going bald and his remaining hair was long, straggly, and thin. His beard looked as though he trimmed it with a Swiss Army knife, and he had deep acne pockmarks. His hazel eyes, which could be merry and mischievous, could also look frighteningly intense. Once when we were looking at old videos, he said he looked like a homeless person. “More like a serial killer,” I said. I was only half-joking. But his looks weren’t important to me.

I thought he was clever—he’d make us howl with wry jokes about current events, and his bookshelf overflowed with Vonnegut novels, Edison bios, and computer technical manuals. And generous, too—he’d spend an entire day fixing his neighbor’s master cylinder for free. On the other hand, his sense of humor could be very bizarre. Like the two tins on the top of his fridge; one was labeled “human eyeballs” and the other, “human fingers.” They were empty—I checked. But there was something about him that made me wonder if he had a double life. I laughed it off as writer’s fancy.

So, tIM struck me as a living Rubik’s Cube, or better yet, like those plastic holograms which show a different picture depending on which way you turn it. That fascinated me and, of course, I longed to solve the puzzle. Our friends that knew him much better assured me he was harmless. He was as different from my soon-to-be-ex as possible, and that difference fascinated and scared me. Too much. He was too much for me. However, he did ride a motorcycle, and that intrigued me most of all.

I hadn’t been on one since I was a teenager. My sister Pat, ten years older than me, had a friend whose younger brother had a bike. One humid, sunny Minnesota afternoon, they insisted I try it. Maybe she wanted to impress Greg, or maybe they were trying to fix me up with his younger brother who was cute in a teen idol sort of way. Or maybe—this is what I thought afterwards—maybe she hated me. But, because I loved her, I said I’d try it.

“You’ll love it,” she shouted as the bike roared to life. “It’s so much fun!” Nothing about the bike or boy inspired confidence, but I did get on behind him and he took off with a spray of gravel. I hated the speed, I hated clinging to him and I hated how the wind blew my hair in my eyes. I started screaming as we roared down the highway that ran between the green fields and didn’t stop until after Steve disgustedly deposited me back on the driveway. No, I didn’t think motorcycling was at all fun.

Yet, some thirty years later, that’s all I wanted. To be radical. Be dangerous. Be free. Be other than what I felt like I was—an unemployed, middle-aged mother of four. So I told tIM sure I’d go out for dinner with him but only if we rode the bike.

That night, tIM showed up at my door and whipped a drooping, half-crushed rose from his leather jacket. He handed it to me along with a beaten-up red Bell motorcycle helmet that was missing a visor. Then he told me my twill slacks wouldn’t do, I had to wear jeans and change my sandals. Did I happen to have a pair of hiking boots? No? Well, then, wear leather sneakers and I’d need a leather jacket, too. Didn’t have one? Well, denim was all right. I objected—it was hot outside.

“It’ll be chilly on the bike especially after dark and if we fell—not that we’re going to—denim cuts down on road rash.” Road rash, he explained, was skin torn by contact with the pavement. He tossed it off casually as if such injuries were merely minor inconveniences. I was pretty sure I was making a mistake, but I wouldn’t back out.

“Just do whatever I do,” he said as he made sure the strap under my chin was tight enough. “Don’t put your feet down until I tell you to. If I lean, lean with me—we won’t tip over. Don’t lean the other way, because that will make us crash.” Then he got on and started his’79 Kawasaki 750.

It was a real ratbike—it backfired every time he throttled down, had worn paint, rusty chrome and a ripped seat. His biker friends who rode the big new Kawasaki Ninjas, Ducatis or Harleys loved to make jokes about his old 750 but tIM cherished it.

I climbed on behind him and settled into the passenger seat. Motorcyclists rarely call it that. Some call it the p-pad—and “p” has more to do with cats than passengers. Others call it the bitch seat and whoever rides back there rides bitch. I’m glad I didn’t know about that back then.

I gingerly held onto his jacket but he reached back and grabbed my hands, placed them around his torso and took off. He rode considerably slower than Steve had so many years ago, though perhaps it only seemed as if he did. Even so, it was enough to change my perception. This time, the bike’s potentially lethal tango seduced me.

A bike’s motion is like tightly-linked parallel turns in downhill skiing. It’s a sailboat coming around so sharply the rudder is exposed. It’s the hostile jig two boxers perform in the ring—and it’s a right, and a left, and a right. I was astonished and entranced by this flitting and sinuous weaving and the abrupt lean of the bike as it cornered at an insane angle. But, more than that, there was a rhythm, a pattern, a dance that my body responded to on a visceral level. I was terrified and yet yearned to give myself over to that wild, motorized beat.

The world around me was transformed. A simple ride from Studio City to Burbank became an adventure akin to riding with the Pony Express. An ordinary Toyota Camry had never seemed so massive, so lethal. SUVs were buffalo rumbling beside us, ready to crush us out of existence. The streets were a wilderness of steel, rubber, and concrete. And we rode with no metal shell around us, no seatbelts, no air bags to protect us. I imagined there were three of us on that bike—tIM, myself, and Death with scythe in hand. Perhaps Death rode on the tank or perhaps he rode behind me, I didn’t know. I didn’t care. I had never felt so alive.

And then there was the eroticism I had never suspected was there. My legs spread and my thighs lying along his thighs. My crotch, by necessity, nestled up to his butt—and he had a very nice one. No wonder most men don’t like to ride behind other men. And I became so aware of my breasts when sudden stops slammed them into his back. An untamed sexuality as radical and dangerous as the motorcycle flamed up and embarrassed me. I scooched back on the seat as far as I could and stiffened my arms the next time he began to brake, but it was too late. New, exciting possibilities roared within.

We stopped for dinner at an Italian place on Magnolia. The cafeteria-style food was at best mediocre but I was satisfied: I was far from my previous life and going farther. After dinner, he asked me what I wanted to do.

“Can we go up to the mountains? Somewhere I can see for a long, long way?” I wanted that sense of visual perspective to find the internal kind. Now I see it was a different kind of perspective I was looking for. I needed one that comes by contrast and in that contrast between the extremes we find our private normal.

He knew, tIM said, just the place. We got back on the bike and headed for the Crest. Traffic was light, and tIM rolled on the throttle. The wind stung my eyes as it had when I was a child, but this time, I craved it. I thought if I let go, I would blow right off. Just sail backwards like an empty plastic grocery bag, dipping and swirling through the air until I came to rest somewhere far behind him. And then I did cling to him.

He turned up the Crest and we leaned together through tight hairpins and wide sweepers doing a smooth, elegant mambo past towering rock walls and sheer drop-offs. The tire tripped the Light Fantastic far too close to the edge for my comfort. Visions of crunching bones, blood, pain and sheering metal overwhelmed me. Terror clenched my belly and my hands wet with sweat clutched his torso. All eroticism was wiped out by dread.

Just around an outcropping of stone at the entrance to a Forest Service road, tIM pulled over and stopped. I shakily climbed down from the back and took my helmet off. We walked along a narrow ridge and looked out over the valley. There it was, the sunset.

The Desert Candles—those astonishingly tall, white-flowered plants native to California—caught the last rays of the sun and gleamed high on the mountain slopes while the valleys below filled with sparks of light. Distant LA disappeared as the marine layer rolled in. We talked of things of small importance until the world was dark and the headlights of other travelers on the Crest looked like air bubbles flowing up through a dark champagne. Then we walked back to the bike.

I knew tIM wanted to kiss me and he would’ve if only I walked a bit closer to him or if I slowed down. His desire hung in the air between us as an unspoken question. I didn’t move towards him and I put my helmet on right away though I did let him fasten the strap.

On the way down, perhaps because the drop-offs were hidden by the night, perhaps because I began to trust a man who wanted a kiss but waited, I gave myself over to the rhythm of this twisting ride, to trust the massive physical forces that kept the bike balanced in the turn. Exhilaration such as I’d never known before vibrated through me and the rising tension flowered into joy and release.

No, I was wrong—the motorcycle’s motion isn’t skiing, or sailing, or boxing. It’s more like wild sex—back and forth, back and forth. And when we reached a straightaway, I let go of tIM and stood up on the pegs. I leaned against his back and flung out my arms. I was free and I knew I had to have this experience again and again.

Suddenly, it didn’t matter that I had no job prospects or couldn’t decide whether to quit or be fired. It no longer mattered that I was getting older, or that I had lost my best friend—my ex-husband—in the divorce. Or that my boys were in the Midwest with him and my girls hated California. All those things that seemed as dangerous as the rock walls and drop-offs were challenges, the means to experience the risk and joy of living. And, in that moment, it was more than enough I was alive and free and had an unknown future. I was going to take the twists and turns of life like this bike took the Crest. I was going to maneuver through my stalled dreams like this bike took the streets. I wasn’t a minivan trapped in a slow-moving motherly life. I had put myself in a risky position and I would embrace it with joy and find my way.

We stopped for a drink and later, as he put on his helmet, his jacket and t-shirt lifted exposing his torso. There on his flat stomach was a thin streak of black hair running down, circling his belly button and disappearing into his jeans. I wanted to touch where the plane of his belly met and curved over his hip bone. It captivated me and aroused me and was an image that came back frequently over the next few days. An image that still tugs at my heart. But I didn’t touch him; I climbed on the bike and he carried me home.

I didn’t become a motorcycle right away either. As so many other LA dreamers do, I temped that summer filling in for a day or a week at places as glamorous as MTV or as prosaic as a cable company. But in my pre-California life, I had been a communications liaison for an adult education program. I had been a Vice-President of Public Relations. I had a Master’s degree in theology. I had published three books and scores of articles. I had been a columnist in two national magazines, damn it! And there I was cross-checking names and addresses against billing records then going home to two hostile teenage children. When my youngest daughter went to visit her father in Illinois and decided to live with him, I was devastated. I thought about taking any regular job just to be done with the uncertainty. But I wasn’t going to settle. Not this time. I was going to go for what I wanted, and, by then, I thought tIM was part of the equation.

Throughout May and June, he pursued me as I had never been pursued. He’d send me silly e-mails like, “I’m sitting on my motel room bed wearing nothing but a towel and socks and thinking of u.” He bought me the kind of trinkets displayed beside gas station registers and the sheer volume was impressive if not their substance. And he made me laugh. I needed to laugh so I kept going out with him. But after that first date he drove his beat up old Camaro because the bike always needed work.

When he’d bring me home, his desire was as heady as the night-blooming jasmine by the pool. I began to think of what it would be like to kiss him and then I wanted to kiss him and then I wanted to badly. But I knew it wouldn’t work—knew he wasn’t right for me. One afternoon we were at a party and I couldn’t bear the weight of desire and dread anymore. We went for a walk on the shaded streets of Pasadena’s Historic Bungalow district, I told him I wanted to be just friends. The thing was, I said, it was better I didn’t see him at all because I knew he wanted to kiss me and I wanted to kiss him and that wouldn’t do. “Like this?” he said—and he did—fierce, passionate and hardcore French. It was the motorcycle all over again. I couldn’t resist—I didn’t want to resist—I kissed him back.

Over the next few weeks, I realized it was speeding out of control and this wasn’t where I wanted to go. I tried to break it off. I refused to go to his house. I knew, if I went, what would happen, but I couldn’t bear the growing sexual tension. So, when tIM called one morning at six a.m. and asked me to come over, I went.

It was Saturday so I could fly along the 134 East. As I turned onto the 2 South, anticipation tightened my thighs, my belly. He lived in a section of Eagle Rock where mariachi music blared at night, fighting cocks crowed incessantly in the morning and no one could afford to paint their house. tIM rented a tiny, yellow, one-bedroom place tucked between the steep, overgrown hillside and a shabby two-story in front. I took a deep breath and stepped inside. Even though it was morning, he had candles burning in his bedroom—I could see them on the dresser as I stood in the living room. How foolish in the dawn. How romantic. I dropped my purse on the floor and soon our clothes followed. Then I discovered that which I had always assumed was the stuff of fiction and film; I experienced passion. Later, I drove home marveling at the sweet ache between my legs but I took a bath before the children got up. I couldn’t wait to go over to his house again.

Passion is more than the thrill of the deal or the roller coaster ride can provide, more heady than the bliss of water after hours in the desert. A superb tension that grows until the next time you can see him. Oh, please, today, right now. Please this minute—I cannot wait any longer. Passion is being caught up in a towering breaker and ground into the sand then seized and tossed under again over and over until you believe you’ll never escape and you would quite willingly drown.

One summer evening, as the sweet, cool night air flowed through the open windows and Beethoven’s Pastoral played on the stereo, we had sex on his sofa. No, that’s too tame a word for it. We were screwing pure and simple, and I was annihilated.

In that moment, I thought I would do anything he asked. In that instant, crimes of passion or financial devastation seemed perfectly logical means to remain in those throes. Passion trumps reason, demolishes responsibility and sweeps away such petty notions as being a respectable mother. It’s the fierce trap, the negation of control. It possesses a terrible, severe beauty, and, as I write this, I long and fear to experience it again.

Those moments made me feel daring, radical—as if I was a motorcycle. But, by then, I was half of a twosome like any other couple. And I always saw him on his schedule, always over at his house, always did what he wanted. I hadn’t traveled far at all from my prior life. I was still a minivan.

After two months of sex interspersed with job-hunting, I landed what seemed to be a dream position—celebrity personal assistant to a multi-millionaire actress/producer. I quickly learned anyone who needs two housekeepers, a handyman, a general factotum, a business manager, bookkeeper and three lawyers as well as a personal assistant to manage their daily life isn’t the easiest employer. Especially one who had run through two other assistants in less than two years.

My boss Betty was as complicated as tIM, and I suppose that’s why I felt a bond with her from the moment we met. I was awed by those who called and came to the house. Dazzled by the Mercedes 650e and the Rolls Royce in the garage by the twin sub-zero freezers. Stupefied by a woman who fed jumbo tiger shrimp to her cats and steak and ribs to her dogs but cheated the repairmen. She was like a high-speed car chase—you just had to watch to see what happened next. Unfortunately, those in close proximity sometimes get hit and road kill is a personal assistant’s job description.

From the first day, I was the one who lied for her. I was the one who took the blame for things that happened before I came, for relationships that had soured years before. My job was to smile when she humiliated me in front of others because of a mistake she had made. But I had learned my lesson at the production company, shoved down my distaste and lied and smiled and remained employed. But it wasn’t just the duplicity that wore at me.

I was the script analyst, the travel agent, the buffer and the human BlackBerry one moment. In the next, I was her confidante as she sat at her dressing table and hugged a picture of her late husband. I was the one who was expected to crawl around in my heels and skirt in a crawl space or garage looking for an errant kitten. I was expected to come in at night or on holidays to do what the housekeeper could have—and should have—done and what Betty could have though perhaps not should have done for herself.

It was all right, I assured myself, I could protect my self-image. I knew where my boundaries were. But it felt all too much like my first marriage; I was too used to being an extension of someone else. I suppose, on some level, Betty sensed that at the interview and I was hired for my essential weakness as much as for my strengths.

Then, on one blisteringly hot evening in September, 1997, it all just got to me: the move to California, the divorce, this intense relationship I knew should lead nowhere and the high-pressure job. By the time I had gotten home and flopped on the sofa, I thought “life sucks and then you die” seemed an overly optimistic cliché. I could only think that I was at heart a minivan and LA is a Hummer kind of town. I should move back to the Midwest. I called tIM and told him I was giving up and going home.

An hour later, he knocked at my door and peered through the screen. “Want to go for a ride on the bike?” That September evening, he was my motor oil Jesus, a blue-collar savior. I said yes, grabbed the helmet and jacket he held out, pulled the door shut behind me and we climbed on his bike.

He turned onto the 405. Like usual, it was a veritable parking lot. All the lanes were jammed with SUVs and sedans crawling up the Sepulveda Pass heading towards the Los Angeles basin. I couldn’t bear traveling at no more than a brisk walking pace. Not that night. I regretted my decision.

tIM, though, had no intention of puttering along in traffic; he started to lane-split. That means a motorcyclist hurtles between two moving vehicles with just a few inches clearance on either side. Lane-splitting requires titanium nerves or, alternatively, full-blown insanity.

Certain I was about to die, I clutched his waist so hard I’m sure he lost his breath. I desperately hung on as we rushed by all the impatient drivers sitting in their metal cages. tIM, however, expertly wove between them. The bike danced this way to avoid a SUV hogging the lane and slipped that way to evade an absent-minded Nissan owner. Within minutes, we had passed hundreds of cars and were turning onto the 10 towards Santa Monica.

I felt an unholy glee as I realized the true power of the motorcycle in Los Angeles. It had nothing to do with brand or engine size or speed and had everything to do with maneuverability. We weren’t like these poor stiffs forced to creep along, unable to escape. Nothing could stop us! Power to the biker scum.

Soon, we were zooming up the Pacific Coast Highway. The sun was setting over the water in a splash of orange and magenta. The rolling breakers swept in along pale, sandy beaches and the Santa Monica mountains loomed against the darkening sky. I raised my visor and greedily sucked in the cool, ocean breeze. And then it happened—as it’s happened so many times since—I sighed as I rode.

A deep sigh from the bottom of my feet that expelled every bit of breath and, along with it, all my accumulated stress, tension and anxiety. I imagined it streaming behind me as we roared towards Malibu. Imagined it lost in the polluted inland haze. Then I inhaled a rich sense of relaxation and joy along with the salt tang. I was not only calmed but liberated. I let go of tIM and flung my hands out.

This was amazing, I thought. This is everything it’s cracked up to be—it really is freedom. I want to be able to escape traffic. I want to be able to lane-split. I want to be able to fly down the empty highway and feel the wind on my face, to find peace whenever I wanted like he could. I want this spontaneous freedom. I needed this and I couldn’t depend on his sporadic urge to take me along. A ferocious desire shook me. I had to have this at my beck and call. In that split second, I decided to stay in LA, learn to ride in front, and get my own motorcycle.

For, as wonderful as it is on the back, there’s one thing the passenger never experiences—control. She has no say over where the bike goes, how fast it gets there, or how it meets obstacles in its way. This then and not the minivan was my life’s metaphor: I had been the passenger in my own life. If I wanted to be truly free—to be a motorcycle—I had to take control, learn to a balance between my needs and others, find my own power and do it at the speed of life. I had to take responsibility for my choices. I was going to become a motorcycle by riding one.

Over tIM’s, my children’s and my boss’s protests, that is. tIM didn’t want to bear the guilt if I got hurt or died. My children thought it would be totally humiliating if their mother rode—besides they thought I was too old. Both my children and my boss thought it was far too déclassé. And tIM, my kids and my boss all agreed motorcycling was too dangerous. The word that cropped up in all their objections was woman—motorcycling wasn’t for womenand especially for women like me. But I wouldn’t be swayed or delayed. It was something I had to do and do it as soon as possible so I signed up for a basic learn-to-ride course.

tIM came around enough to go out an buy an abandoned 1978 Kawasaki 400 for $100 to surprise me. I was surprised all right—it was rusted, the seat was torn and it didn’t run. To top it off, I had to pay for a bike I wouldn’t have chosen, and that felt like I was the passenger once again. On the other hand, it was mine, all mine.  For over a month I worked with him doing all that it took to get it running again. At last it roared to life and was ready for a road test. Since I didn’t know how to ride yet I had to stand at the end of the driveway and watch tIM ride my motorcycle away and wait for him to come back. And that, too, bothered me.

By then, Betty had begun giving me huge piles of clothes she no longer wanted. I was to pick out what I wanted and give the rest away. I didn’t want staid St. John’s Knits that made me look 20 years older, but it was clear she wanted me to wear them and so I did. “Little Betty” the rest of the staff called me and I hated it. She kept me late if she knew I had a date with tIM and brought me with her to the country club or the Bel-Air Hotel bar for drinks. Her rich, old male friends, she said, would make a better catch than tIM. Then again, if any of them did come on to me, it was hell at work for the next few days.

Finally, it was time for the motorcycle training course. I thought she’d find a reason to prevent me from going but she didn’t. That first day we got on the bikes there were twelve of us in the parking lot at Pasadena City College—all men except one other woman. Most of the men already knew how to ride, but the woman didn’t. She was a middle-aged librarian and we avoided each other during the course. It was as if  two women standing in close proximity would snap together like magnets and make a feminist statement. That wasn’t a statement I, at least, was prepared to make. Over the past ten years, I’ve found that women don’t take up motorcycling for some “Storm the last bastion of masculinity, women!” reason. Rather, like me, they tend have very private reasons—so private that they may not even know what they are and may only reverse-engineer them by seeing the effects in their lives. All of us, though, would say we found freedom in the ride, which is exactly all men are willing to admit as well.

Major Bill taught us to creep through tight turns, uncertainly weave around cones, to stop without locking up the brakes and not drop the bike. As we rode, the marine layer gradually gave way to sunshine. The next weekend, we learned more of the same and to do it with a little more skill. The librarian failed the test at the end of course when she fell during the quick stop. I passed and felt I should have failed—I knew I wasn’t road-ready. tIM took over as my mentor.

For the next few weeks, I followed tIM on my bike through Eagle Rock. Followed him down strange streets that lead nowhere I knew, confused by his doubling back and forth and the winding roads along the hillside. Mariachi music blared from passing cars and the rundown storefronts were dark and gated. Terrified I wouldn’t see him turn and I’d be left lost and alone, terrified that he would lead where I didn’t have the skills to follow. The night air was chill and moist against my face. We always rode in darkness, and I was always cold.

There was too much to remember—both what was immediate—like shifting and turning—and what was possible—like dogs and unseen oil on the pavement. My bike was far heavier and more awkward to maneuver than the bike I had used in the course and the weight preyed upon my mind even when I did not feel it. I worried I wouldn’t stop in time, would lean too much as I went around a corner—though, god only knows, I didn’t lean much at such slow speeds. But anything off the vertical seemed an invitation to kiss the pavement. It felt as though every driver was out to get me. I felt too exposed without metal walls around me and it felt wrong not to wear a seat belt. I was all too aware I was too vulnerable.

Fear, not freedom, then, was my constant companion. No one can sit beside you as they can in a car advising and warning and affirming. No one can reach over and save you from crashing. You ride alone. You have to even when you ride with others. Even if there was someone on the back. I once heard the average rider makes 300 decisions every mile—or was that minute? I can’t remember which, but I can well believe it’s the latter. And I, alone, had to make them all and ride or fall by those choices.

A bike has a way of paring down options: you can ride smart and live or ride dumb and die. No motorcyclist can afford to forget that for long. Every time we climb on it every mile we ride demands we embrace risk, make choices and fully commit to them even though the result may injure or destroy us. Whether called mistress or master, the bike requires our total allegiance at the moment and in the moment and in the next and the next. Waver in our absolute attention for even an instant and icy-shock-pant-peeing-stomach-churning terror is too often the sharp, immediate reprimand.

To ride, then, is to take control of one’s destiny—it cannot be any other way. Yes, I must make my own decisions and cannot pretend otherwise. I cannot blame anyone else for the consequences. I will end up where I want to go by every choice I make along the way or I will end up hurt or dead as a result of those decisions. It cannot be any other way. And, in the beginning, when the learning curve was steep and perilous, when so much more was unknown than known, feared instead of welcomed, it felt like aloneness not solitude. It was not yet Burke’s “delightful horror” that invigorates the will but it was, as Corey Robin argues, a “revivifying fear. That fear of ourselves will push us to overcome our own desire to forsake our freedom. We will develop a stronger will, finding our freedom precisely in a fear of ourselves.” Or, in my case, in mastering my fear of the ride.

Early that summer, I married tIM. I didn’t want to marry and wasn’t sure I should even be living with him, but that’s what he wanted and he offered me insurance—literally. If I married him I’d have health, dental and eye coverage. Marriage without love is a charade I knewand I could not, would not live a lie. But I did love him and just because most marriages seemed to end up with one person being a passenger to another’s will didn’t mean it had to happen. Besides, insurance in the eyes of the world is exactly like a helmet and safety gear to a rider: it’s what responsible people did, and so I said I do. And I kept on riding.

But no matter how fearfully I made each decision in those early months the next one was easier to make with confidence. As confidence grew, I took on new challenges though at first they frightened me as well. I ventured out into the LA daylight and rode the city streets and freeways and onto the twisty canyon roads. I learned to lane-split. There were close calls, rain, wind, uneven pavement and that brutal LA congestion. But I rode and then rode some more and overcame my fears. And when I did that I found the freedom I had sensed from the back of the bike. I learned to love the solitude of riding even when riding with others. To ride then is a motorized metaphor for an independent, adult life. I was no longer a passenger I thought.

I only rode, though, when tIM did—he would have it no other way. It finally occurred to me that the men who took the course with me had probably been riding alone from the beginning, so why shouldn’t I? And so I did—I rode the motorcycle to work. That first solo ride reminded me of those nights in Eagle Rock—I was once again afraid I’d run into a situation I couldn’t handle. But I did manage. I arrived home from the commute exhilarated instead of enervated.

Within a year, I had bought a brand-new Harley-Davidson Sportster 883. Along the way, I began to make decisions based on what made me happy, what made me feel free. I rode to work, rode to visit friends, rode everywhere I could. And then I rode away from my job—it was just another way I was living my life as a passenger.

Powerful industry people offered to get me another job in the industry, but that’s not what I wanted do; I had come out here to make my way as a writer and I had to give it my best shot. While I was sending out my work to publishers, I read scripts that summer for the Nicholl Fellowship through the Academy of Motion Picture Arts. My route took me along Muholland Drive, down Benedict Canyon and into Beverly Hills. The first time I took that route after I had left Betty’s employ, I gave myself over to the rhythm of the ride on Muholland’s curves, delighting in the tightly-linked S-turns when I broke out of a wooded section and saw the San Fernando Valley spread out to my right. And then I sighed, a deep sigh from the bottom of my booted soles to the top of my helmeted head and a quiet joy filled me. I was a motorcyclist. I was free.

That fall, I began the Master’s in Professional Writing at USC and taught freshman composition. I rode home alone from campus late at night without fear. But once I began to ride alone on the bike my marriage deteriorated swiftly. tIM’s dark humor that had impressed me and everyone else so much turned macabre in private. He’d put his hands around my neck and lightly squeeze pretending he was angry, pretending he was choking me. Or so he’d said. He’d follow me around the house demanding over and over if I slept with another man and it drove me mad. He threatened to have someone come and kill me while he was out of town—but he was just joking. So he said. Ha-ha.

Then one day he trapped me in the garage and threatened to kill me with a palm tree saw—a wicked scythe on the end of a long stick. He wouldn’t drop the saw or let me by until I held out my arms and said, “so kill me then.” I was terrified, confused and thought about calling the police but worried about what he’d do if he knew I had. An hour later he put a gun in his mouth and pulled the trigger. In those milliseconds between his lips closing around the barrel and his pulling the trigger, my heart stopped. It didn’t go off. There were no bullets. And then he laughed. It was just a joke, he said, and didn’t I have a sense of humor? A friend and I forced him to go the emergency room. I didn’t tell the doctor about anything except the palm tree saw and the gun. The doctor said tIM had a over-the-counter drug-induced psychotic break from using pseudophedrine in combination with guarana to stay awake on his overnight trucking schedule. tIM just had to stop using the stimulants and all would be ok. Insurance covered the visit but there was no coverage for the terror I had felt, and no doctor could repair the damage to my trust.

We began to go to marriage counseling. It didn’t work. How could it when tIM thought that all that was wrong with our marriage was that I didn’t know how to take a joke? The therapist, apparently, didn’t have a sense of humor either: After she heard about everything he had done, his secret bizarre behaviors and other incidents she asked me to meet with her privately and said that tIM didn’t have a drug-induced psychotic episode, he was psychotic. She suggested I leave him, but, if I did, I should do so when he wasn’t in town. But marriage meant for better or worse, sickness and health so I tried to stay, but things just got worse, more scary and hurtful. And that’s when the Cirque de Soleil balance shifted.

When he went to work on one of his two-day trips, my children and three of my friends packed and moved me in one day. By the time we were done, it was dark and chilly and there was only one more thing left to move—my motorcycle. My daughter offered to do it as she had learned to operate her own motorcycle by then, but I insisted on riding away by myself.

The streets were empty as I roared down the street, and I began to sing and weave the bike back and forth within my lane, coming to a full stop at a red light without putting my feet down then rolling on the throttle once the light had turned green. I rose on the footpegs over the railroad tracks then sank back in my seat. Those miles of asphalt became a darkened ballroom—a place of liberation where I relished dancing alone on the dark empty street. There was no fear in me only confidence in my freedom of choice; the freedom to ride away from the past and the freedom to ride toward a future where I took complete responsibility for my own actions.

That’s how it began, then, my love affair with motorcycles, with this strange man, and, consequently, a journey into womanhood I never suspected, never anticipated. It was a pilgrimage perhaps I shouldn’t have taken with him as my guide, but then I wouldn’t have known the kind of passion I’d only read about, and I may have never gotten on a bike.

It was the motorcycle that brought me into his life and the motorcycle that changed me. Those changes were what saved me, destroyed our relationship, and caused me to roar down the 210 five years later. I was finally riding up front in my own life. I was finally taking responsibility for my own choices, taking control of my own destiny and finding a dynamic balance. He has another woman now who rides on the back, one who he will never allow to ride her own motorcycle, a woman who would never think of doing so.

I have become an investigative motorcycle journalist now. I’ve sold a script and my novel is with an excellent New York agent. I’m in love with a man who loves that I ride my own ride, make my own decisions, live my own life and sticks to my principles.

And as long as I do stay riding in front of my own life, I find freedom and I find joy. When I forget, that’s when things go badly, but life has a way of paring down options and I’m learning to ride smart.

Almost five hundred pounds of throbbing, hot piston power thrust between my legs but I’ve tamed this surging beast. It will obey me. I’m the one who calculates my entry speed into the corner, easing off the throttle, downshifting for power and acceleration. I lean so far into the turn that the foot peg scrapes on the asphalt, and at that sound, I exult. I am free!

And I’m in control. I have met the challenge of fear, balance, power and the speed of life and I’ve emerged the victor—and not just with this turn, but the previous ones and the next and the next and the next. I sail along the highway, inches from a sheer drop-off into the valley, but I am confident and unafraid. I choose my own path, aware of the risks and using them to increase my pleasure.

I am a woman.

I am a rider.

I am a motorcycle.

And I won’t ride bitch in anyone’s life.

January 31, 2009

First thoughts on MSF’s new motorcycle license

Back when the motorcycle license tests used at almost every DMV in the USA today were developed, 40% of rider in fatal crashes were unlicensed or improperly licensed. Today it’s  26%. And, back in those years, few motorcyclists took rider training. In those 35 plus years, more than 4.5 million have been trained using MSF curriculum.

Iow, never before in history have more riders on the road been trained and licensed. Back then, bikes didn’t necessarily even have front brakes–and the brakes they often had were drum brakes. And there were still a lot of bikes with non-standardized controls and all sorts of things that we find charming or intriguing as we stand around kicking tires in parking lots today.

More importantly, more than 3 million–or almost 67%—of those riders have been trained since 1997. Virtually all of those who graduated received a driver’s license waiver for the skills portion of the test at their local DMV.

But, since 1997,  motorcyclist fatalities have more than doubled. A whopping 74% of those dead riders were properly licensed. No one knows how many of those fatalities had gone through training–because the very few attempts to determine that have only looked at whether the rider was trained in their state and never tried to find out if they had graduated from a course in another state.

A rational, objective observer would think the soaring death toll at time when the vast majority of dead riders are licensed, would be the ideal time to question whether the licensing tests–and training–really did reduce crashes. One woudl think rider educators were more interested in saving riders’ lives than in defending a manufacturers’ trade group.

And it would be a time when, according to what MSF called itself in a recent press release,  “the nation’s preeminent motorcycle safety organization“, would seek to improve the test to ensure that licensed riders can safely and competently ride their motorcycles in traffic. That is what a safety organization would reasonably be expected to be most concerned about.

Yet, as reported in the related entry on Moonrider Redux, this is MSF’s stated reason for a new motorcycle licensing test: “recent revisions have been made to accommodate changes in motorcycle design and significant advances in motorcycle technology; larger displacement engines, changes in motorcycle wheelbase, the growing popularity of large displacement scooters, and 3-wheel vehicles.”

Iow, it wasn’t riders dying that prompted the MSF to change the test. No, it was to make it easier for the kind of motorcycles that are currently being sold. Because that is what Jim Heideman told me he was about when I talked to him at that Sunday at the Motorcycle Show in Chicago last winter.

There’s something extremely fishy about what MSF writes and what TPTB led the good Jim Heideman to believe:

Does lowering the timing standards for the Quick Stop make it easier for those big bikes—that invariably have disc brakes if not dual discs, if not ABS or linked braking systems—possible to get through the test?

Does lowering the timing standard make it easier for bikes with more horsepower to get through Swerve?

And what difference does wheelbase make in how quickly a rider can stop in the Quick Stop or swerve?

And unless you’re riding one of those ridiculously long customs, any two-wheeler could make the sharp turn without a 6-foot turning path.

Heideman was told by TPTB at MSF that the wheelbase issue made it too difficult for these modern bikes to do a 2-foot offset weave. Therefore it had to be eliminated. And the U-Turn had to be changed to make it easier for these big bikes.

Oh really? All one has to do is watch one session of Streetmasters. At the beginning of the U-Turn from a stop—and note that it is one from a literal stop—old farts on big Gold Wings are dropping their bikes and middle-aged and young men are straining to get their sport-tourers and sportbikes turned in that tight radius. And when it comes to the 10-foot x 20-foot offset weave—and yes, that isn’t a typo—many can’t do it successfully at first. Yet, within a short session where proper technique is taught—and not just “coached”—Gold Wing or Road Warrior or Fat Boy or BMW GS or K or Ninja are gracefully making U-Turns from a stop and doing that severe offset weave like they had done it all their lives.

And I’ll never forget darling Scott taking me for a ride on Horse Thief Mile on his Goldwing and then scaring the crap out of me by suddenly starting to do donuts once we got back to the parking lot. No, donuts aren’t the minimum level of skill—nor are 10 x 20 offset weaves—but the point is the bikes with large displacement engines and longer or shorter wheelbases can do them and do them. It’s the riders who can’t at the DMV. But give them solid curriculum and competent instructors and the riders can, too.

But let’s get a little closer to the minimally skilled riders that MSF sets out to test. A few years ago, Ross McClellhan of the South Carolina program split the BRC in two. In the first half, riders learned on training bikes. And that’s where the course ended for those who either did not perform well or decided it wasn’t for them. Those who wanted to continue on to the next level (Range 2) and take the evaluations and gain the driver’s license-waiver had to return with the motorcycle that they would be riding after graduation. Ross tweaked the curriculum significantly and his instructors had people with massive Victorys and Harleys and Hondas taking and passing Range 2 with good scores—and, get this, they were doing the U-Turn in a 20-foot box. That’s right. MSF has bikes 600cc and above using the 24-foot box in the RST.

They were all the minimally-trained novice riders—just like the folks you all teach on little itsy bitsy bikes. Once again it’s not the bikes that can or can’t do it—it’s the riders.

And none of the changes that were made had to be made to accommodate big bikes or scooters. Now three-wheelers? Maybe they couldn’t make that turn in a 20-foot box and maybe they couldn’t make that sharp turn the way it used to be. But why change it for all bikes in ways that make it easier for minimally-skilled riders. Why not have a separate test? Well, they do—but the only thing that’s different is the lack of the U-Turn test. Yet Three-Wheelers can capsize if they run off the road in a U-Turn…

So it’s just plain bull that the test had to be redone because the bikes had gotten too big and awkward to pass the Alt-MOST.

The test had to change because…well…that will be the next Moonrider Redux entry.

January 24, 2009

Thoughts on the NJ legislation

Assembly 3292 concerns me greatly. I had discussed an earlier attempt by MIC/H-D to fiddle with the motorcycle safety program in the old Journalspace blog—but this goes far, far beyond that.

The most serious issue is it allows MSF (or something like T3RG) to take over the program.

Removing accountability

Putting that aside, its just as grievous that it strips riders of any say in what happens to their program. And that worries me—and should worry you—greatly. Because the change removes not just accountability but makes the connection to the state very tenuous indeed. It’s the Chief Administrator only who has any authority at all over the program. As long as the MSF standards and requirements are met or exceeded, the way the statutes are worded, she has no real authority over it—except to set fees and collect them.

Furthermore, the amended bill also gives greater range for the Chief Administrator to pull certification from a training course for “reasonable cause”. Reasonable cause is not defined. If MSF—or a private training company—did take over the state program, the quality assurance program could be used to drive competitors out of business as it has been repeatedly tried in California—usually successfully.

As a result, the Chief Administrator position becomes very important.

In New Jersey, the Chief Administrator is a political appointment position and is currently held by Sharon Anne Harrington. This is why this matters in increasing importance:

· She was appointed in 2004. She’s also Vice Chair of the Region 1 Board of Directors of the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)-and when I get to the entry on the new MSF motorcycling test, that will become interesting.

· Remember, this bill strips the previous rider influence that was in the bill through the Advisory Committee. It’s interesting, then, that Harrrington was previously State Director for U.S. Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D). According to the MRF, Lautenberg was the one who wanted to deny states without a universal helmet law access to motorcycle safety funding in the highway bill.

· And most significantly of all, before that was “a partner with Public Strategies Impact, a Trenton-based professional firm”. Public Strategies Impact is a lobbying firm.

The Harley Factor

Interestingly, Harley-Davidson’s lobbying firm in New Jersey is MultiState—and MultiState is a client of Public Strategies Impact.

If MSF takes over the state program, Harley-Davidson—although it pays the most in member dues to MSF—does not have to file a pay-for-play form with the NJ ELEC because of the non-profit exclusion.

Harley has serious financial problems—according to the ’08 4th quarter report, profits fell almost 60% in the last quarter and about 30% for the entire year, two plants are closing, two others are shrinking, 1,100 jobs will be cut. Ziemer is resigning this year and Sy Naqvi, has taken the blame for Zarcone’s reckless policies of H-D’s Financial Services. HDFS had to write-off $63.5 million in bad loans this quarter and is looking for a billion dollar bailout this year. (And didn’t I predict all of this? I am so damn good.)

Ziemer promised stockholders in the Earnings Call Transcript that marketing dollars will be spent even more carefully—and Riders Edge has always been positioned by H-D as a marketing scheme.

In a motorcycle bust cycle, Harley has to, by any means, capture the market for new bike purchasers. There are relatively few motorcycle training providers in New Jersey—but at least three Riders Edge programs. The amended bill would give exceeding power to whatever organization controls the state program and its ability to certify training companies or the two free sites.

Otoh, if MSF should take over the program, it doesn’t do quality assurance evaluation on Riders Edge sites. That’s done by the national corporate Rider’s Edge. Though even if MSF did, it’s like asking an employee to critique his employer’s children’s artwork given the fiducary relationship between Harley and MSF.

But using a front organization to advance one’s bottom  line isn’t just related to driving more students to one’s showroom. Another way to do that is to make it too expensive for others to operate in a supposedly free market.

The cost of training in NJ

The state program courses—offered only at two sites—are currently free. Private and dealer training currently varies in cost from $250-$325.

Assembly 3292 also allows for student training to become much more expensive. It allows for a raise in fees, taking off the restrictions on reasons to raise the course cost, the ability to charge a license-waiver fee and a course certification fee. While those fees may not be charged or the cost to take the course increase, the amended bill will not only raise certain costs but takes away the ability to call the Chief Administrator to account for fees charged or increased.

Beyond quality evaluation terrorist techniques already used in the MSF-administrated California program, control over how much fees charged to private training companies could, in these economic times, drive a company out of business.

As would controlling the RERPS of instructors who teach at those businesses.

Engine displacement restrictions

Another of the changes in the motorcycle safety regulations in the bill puts a restriction on those who take the test at the DMV on a small bike—they can only ride a bike 500cc. or smaller. However, if they take the training course and pass it, there is no engine displacement restriction. Training bikes, as we know, are limited by MSF to 500ccs or smaller.

The only bike used for training close to 500cc is the Buell Blast and it’s only used in Harley-Davidson’s Rider’s Edge. The normal training bike is in the course are around 231cc., which is the cut-off point where the engine displacement restriction would kick in if they took the test at the MVC (their version of the DMV). Iow, what’s good for the goose isn’t good for the gander.

My friend asks, “how does taking the course on a 125,250,or 500cc Buell Blast prepare a person to operate a GSZR 1000, or a Ducati 1198 or a HD 1550 or a Victory?”

Or how about a Honda VTX 1800 or a Suzuki Hayabusa 1340—or tons of other bikes? Though since there’s no studies show that the course prepares a person to ride safely on the road on any kind of motorcycle, does size really matter here?

At the same time, the amended bill adds severe limitations on those who ride on a permit and limits them to a large degree to secondary roads. That type of road is historically far more deadly to motorcyclists than limited access freeways and toll roads. And the nighttime restriction also makes it exceedingly difficult for legal permit holders to ride legally.

Together, the engine displacement restrictions and the permit-holder restrictions work as a stick in lieu of a carrot to drive riders to take the motorcycle training course.

The same course that acts as a liability shield for the motorcycle manufacturer members of MSF.

Who lobbied, through it’s parent and sister organization, the Motorcycle Industry Council, for this bill in conjunction with Harley, the largest MSF dues’ paying member.

Harley, who doesn’t have to file a pay-to-play form if it’s the MSF who takes over if this bill passes.

Harley, who’s in grave financial trouble and who’s lobbying firm hired the same lobbying firm the Motor Vehicle Commission’s Chief Administrator worked for previously.

And ding, ding, ding—the cherries line up on the slot machine.

A final word: motorcycle rights activists and rider educators and administrators in every single state must keep an even sharper eye on proposed legislation.

January 23, 2009

It isn’t Saturday, folks

Filed under: motorcycle industry,motorcycle training — wmoon @ 10:38 pm

Geez, folks, what about “on Saturday” makes you think something will be up on Friday?

But there’s this sudden influx of readers here, I will say this: I told you so and I’ve told you so for a long, long time:

  • I told you that the motorcycle boom was ending,
  • I told you that this would mean the motorcycle manufacturers would cut their dues to MSF.
  • I had told you that MSF already got over half of their budget from state programs and when the bust hit, they’d have to take on more administration to make up the shortfall.
  • I warned you when they took over the Honda centers.
  • I warned you again when they put the spin doctor Al Hydeman, in charge of so much.
  • I warned you when I pointed out that MSF was developing a management training program–which, unless there was a sea change coming soon, there was no need to do.
  • I warned you that they were developing a new motorcycle licensing test that would make it easier for all riders to pass.
  • And over three years ago, I told you that the face of rider ed would be very different in five years.

I was dismissed, poo-pooed by almost everyone. It was just my opinion. Speculation. I was too far out there. Blah, blah.

But I was right. God, I’m good. I am so damn good. One day even the most stubborn of you will have to admit I was right about what I’ve told you out of nothing but love and concern for you.

Damn, I was right. I hate being right about these kind of things.

January 13, 2009

Riderchick: notes on what MSF history is and isn’t

How I found out and confirmed its tax status—and MSF’s action to disguise

I had discovered MSF’s tax status through the IRS shortly before the historic interview with most of MSF’s staff in August of 2004. At the end of the interview, as we were walking out together, I casually asked Tim Buche, the president of MSF, if MSF was a 501 (c) 3—a charitable education and/or safety organization or some other category. He hesitated then said it was a 501 (c) 3. I asked him if he was sure. He hesitated again and affirmed it—it was a 501 (c) 3. I decided not to push it at that time as I assumed he had misspoken. It had been a four hour interview, after all, and we all were tired and, while I thought it was curious, I didn’t see any percentage at that point to open up another issue as we were leaving.

I went home and transcribed the interview and began to put together the article for MCN. And I also began to verify what MSF employees had said through checking documents and contacting other sources. Time and time again, what had been said or insinuated by an employee of MSF didn’t measure up to the facts—or logic. Still Dave Searle and Fred Rau had originally decided to present MSF’s side in the trouble in training and so that’s how I wrote first the article.

Now Tim had asked me to send me the article for him to look over it. That is a violation of journalistic principles and yet, in an effort to show our peaceful intention, we from MCN had agreed I would do that. And I did and sent a version that pointed out where all the contradictions were to MCN at the same time. While Tim (and whoever) was looking over the article, so were Dave and Fred as well.

Tim called me about the article and was on speaker phone—though he didn’t tell me who else was in the room. I recorded that conversation with his permission. He liked the article (the one that was only from MSF’s pov) and asked me to makes some changes. Most of the changes were things that could be construed by readers as confirming industry’s role in controlling MSF. He also asked me not to include some things at all—of which one was a very sexist remark. He said his wife would get very offended if he had said that and so please change it. Maybe his wife would—but so would a lot of women (and maybe a few men) if it had been published.

Towards the end of the conversation, I asked Buche again—as if I had forgotten what he said—what kind of non-profit MSF was. I was trying to give him a chance to correct himself, give him the benefit of a doubt. He again said it was a 501 (c) 3. I asked him if he was sure it wasn’t a 501 (c) 6. He immediately found a reason why his attention was needed elsewhere for a moment and he put me on hold. He then came back and said that he had made a mistake—it was the National Motorcycle Safety Fund that was the 501 (c) 3 and not the MSF. And that was a real turning point for me because I knew what NMSF was—and how much it earned already.

NMSF was created decades ago as a way that non-motorcycle manufacturers could donate money (or products) to the cause—though not to MSF itself. And very little is donated—in 2007, for example, total revenues were under $30,000. Almost nothing happens with NMSF in any year. In 2003 and 2004, for example, helmet manufacturers had made irregular helmets (safe but not pretty) available for a mere $10 each to training programs—and it was channeled through NMSF. In 2007, they had about half the revenue left over at the end of the year—that’s how busy it is now—and was back in 2004.

Otoh and for example, MSF’s total revenue in 2007 was over $11,809,185 (of which almost $8 millon were earned through offering rider training and just over $3 million was donated by the manufacturer members). And I knew about how wildly different the revenue and activities were.

Now, if you want to believe that Buche could get a tiny, basically non-active excuse of a fund mixed up with a multi-million dollar trade organization that we had been intensively discussing for hours—well…can I interest you in buying my shares of Enron?

The only public references to MSF’s trade group tax status

The only reference I have been able to find to MSF’s true status—that of a 501 (c) 6 trade organization appeared in the September, 1988 issue of Motorcycle Product News in an article, “Interview with Alan Isley, On Trade Associations”. Isley states, “All of the associations are “not for profit” national trade associations; but they represent slightly different membership within the general motorcycle/ATV business.”

At any rate, shortly after that phone conversation with Buche where he finally had to admit it was a trade group, he went to the Motorcycle Riders Foundation Meeting of the Minds in St. Louis. In the talking points that Buche distributed to participants—and for the first time ever—MSF included what the tax status. Just slipped it in after “non-profit”. They have not done so again.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.